Which statement about naming parties in a human rights claim is true?

Which statement about naming parties in a human rights claim is true?

• A. An employee can name a coworker to be personally named
• B. Employers can only be named
• C. Only unions can be named
• D. Claims must name all coworkers

Answer: (A)

The concept here is that a human rights claim can name individual respondents who are personally responsible for discrimination or harassment, not just the employer. An employee can name a coworker who directly engaged in the discriminatory acts as a party to the claim. This matters because it ensures accountability for the specific conduct and may help widen or tailor remedies to address the harm caused by that individual's actions, while the employer can still be named for vicarious liability or for failures in policy, supervision, or culture. The other statements aren’t accurate because: employers are not the only possible respondents; individuals who participated in the wrongdoing can be named, and the employer can be named as well. Naming unions is not exclusive or required in all cases. And there’s no obligation to name every coworker—only those involved or relevant to the discrimination or harassment.

The concept here is that a human rights claim can name individual respondents who are personally responsible for discrimination or harassment, not just the employer. An employee can name a coworker who directly engaged in the discriminatory acts as a party to the claim. This matters because it ensures accountability for the specific conduct and may help widen or tailor remedies to address the harm caused by that individual's actions, while the employer can still be named for vicarious liability or for failures in policy, supervision, or culture.

The other statements aren’t accurate because: employers are not the only possible respondents; individuals who participated in the wrongdoing can be named, and the employer can be named as well. Naming unions is not exclusive or required in all cases. And there’s no obligation to name every coworker—only those involved or relevant to the discrimination or harassment.